Page Summary
dermotmacflann.livejournal.com - (no subject)
frustratedpilot - (no subject)
huskyteer.livejournal.com - (no subject)
nicodemusrat.livejournal.com - (no subject)
rhanlav.livejournal.com - (no subject)
walkertxkitty.livejournal.com - (no subject)
samwise-fox.livejournal.com - (no subject)
spikedpunch.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Style Credit
- Style: Coffee and Cream for Modular by
- Resources: Black & White Photos
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags

no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 08:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 08:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 09:14 pm (UTC)Indeed!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 09:16 am (UTC)Yeah, I think they are like, two of you on the planet, and Mrs. Gneech is one of them :D
CYa!
Mako
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 09:18 am (UTC)CYa!
Mako
no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 08:55 pm (UTC)I still think that Brunching Shuttlecocks did it best with the Geek Hierarchy chart. :D
no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 09:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 10:05 pm (UTC)[people who make charts about relative lameness in order to feel socially elevated]
then again, maybe there's one below that for people who make comments about people who make charts.. etc. Ah well.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 09:44 pm (UTC)That was rather silly! I guess this just proves that no matter how weird 'you' might be, those 'other guys' are much weirder!
no subject
Date: 2006-07-25 11:10 pm (UTC)My monitor does NOT thank you for the donation of soda, though.
*wanders off to find the cleaning fluid*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 12:30 am (UTC)As for Dork tower, I find it a good-natured satire, here Matt has spent the length of the entire panel griping to the attractive woman about how she will judge him, then does exactly that at the end, I wouldn't say this is poking fun at furs, I would say the opposite, that it's saying people don't give furs a chance, and the writer is making fun of that automatic response "furs = bad"
Dunno, probably just being redundant but I felt talkative today *goes back to the shadows and lurks*
no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 01:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-07-26 10:58 am (UTC)