![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Okay, something weird going on here; on January 1, these were my stats in the morning:
Weight: 281 lbs
Bodyfat: 41.5%
Today, these are my stats in the morning, according to the same scale:
Weight: 290 lbs
Bodyfat: 50%
My intake has not gone up, my exercise has gone WAY up, I can see the reduction of my waistline in the mirror, what's going on, here?
I have two basic theories so far. The first is muscle production. My leg muscles, particularly my hamstrings, are becoming noticeably denser, which would add weight. However, that should reduce bodyfat.
The second is that the scale is screwed up, which is certainly possible. It does occasionally have fits where it will say I weight 500 lbs, 200 lbs, then 6 lbs., none of which are very likely to be true. The question then becomes, was it right on the 1st, is it right today, or was it ever right at all?
I guess I'll just have to wait a week and try again. I sure don't want to be 290 lbs, 50% bodyfat ... that is a definite backslide from my best (which was in the neighborhood of 265 lbs, 35% bodyfat).
Bah.
-The Gneech
Weight: 281 lbs
Bodyfat: 41.5%
Today, these are my stats in the morning, according to the same scale:
Weight: 290 lbs
Bodyfat: 50%
My intake has not gone up, my exercise has gone WAY up, I can see the reduction of my waistline in the mirror, what's going on, here?
I have two basic theories so far. The first is muscle production. My leg muscles, particularly my hamstrings, are becoming noticeably denser, which would add weight. However, that should reduce bodyfat.
The second is that the scale is screwed up, which is certainly possible. It does occasionally have fits where it will say I weight 500 lbs, 200 lbs, then 6 lbs., none of which are very likely to be true. The question then becomes, was it right on the 1st, is it right today, or was it ever right at all?
I guess I'll just have to wait a week and try again. I sure don't want to be 290 lbs, 50% bodyfat ... that is a definite backslide from my best (which was in the neighborhood of 265 lbs, 35% bodyfat).
Bah.
-The Gneech
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 07:12 am (UTC)Something I learned while taking three years of weightlifting in highschool.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 08:37 am (UTC)I also doubt a scale that is accurate to plus-minus 250 lbs. O.o
Oh well =-)
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 07:19 pm (UTC)(because it depends more on how sweaty your feet are - that's what I learned in physics yesterday... not that we were supposed to be measuring our own resistance, but hey...)
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 08:51 am (UTC)Bodyfat
Date: 2003-01-11 08:52 am (UTC)If you want a true measurement of bodyfat, I suggest you see your doctor and get approval for this exercise regime too.
Spots
OT
Date: 2003-01-11 10:25 am (UTC)Re: OT
Date: 2003-01-11 10:30 am (UTC)Totally OT
Date: 2003-01-11 08:53 am (UTC)And as for the bodyfat thing, I know there are other ways of measuring.
Re: Totally OT
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 10:23 am (UTC)For myself, my intake has gone way down (I'm just not hungry like I used to be), and so I've lost sixty pounds since this time last year. But I wouldn't reccomend that approach. Too easy to become anorexic.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 06:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 10:32 am (UTC)no subject
Bodyfat scales use impedence to measure fat content, and are also twitchy. Here's a description from one product:
These devices calculate body fat through a process called Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA). This technology is considered one of the most accurate and easily accessible methods of determining body fat levels. Bioelectrical Impedance is able to recognize fat at both the surface of the body and between internal organs where body fat is unseen. An unfelt, safe, extremely low energy, high frequency electrical signal is sent from one contact point on the body to another body contact point and a measurement of baseline impedance to the flow of the signal is made as it traveled through the body. Using knowledge of the conductivity of fat tissue, these devices calculate the speed at which the electrical signal travels through your body's tissues and the analyzer will use this electrical resistance information to calculate body fat weight and body fat percentage. Bioelectrical impedance results have been highly correlated as accurate with the method of underwater weighing and is considered as one of the three most widely accepted methods of measuring body fat (the other two are skinfold measurement and underwater weighing).
===|==============/ Level Head
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-01-11 12:30 pm (UTC)no subject