More Reasons to Hate MS Word
Aug. 18th, 2003 08:52 amAs if anyone needed any. Look at all the extraneous and probably confidential data MS Word hides in its documents!
Snagged from
dewhitton.
-The Gneech <-- wonders what possible use a word processing document could have for my social security number
Snagged from
-The Gneech <-- wonders what possible use a word processing document could have for my social security number
Asimov's Law
Date: 2003-08-18 06:35 am (UTC)Microsoft's coders have always been careless. You include something such as an 'undo' feature and so you stash that data somewhere in the document. You forget to erase it on close, and all of a sudden it's there forever. The documents bloat but memory's cheap, right?
Of course, no one's yet tallied the economic cost of having to deal with Microsoft's bloated documents over more efficient alternatives.
As for confidential data, I'm certain that someone was certain that document tracking would be necessary, so the document pulls in the information on each writer/editor. If you happened to have filled in the SSN box somewhere, it gets included.
I brought this type of effect up in another friends journal. At that time you could click on any record on the Guiness Book Of World Records site and get a "break this record" button (this has now been eliminated). Even the record for the 'Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act'. The implication is monstrous, but the question is who's the monster? Was the coder that created the script that places a "break this record" button on every record page the villian? He or she was just following a request for functionality. Who's job is it to consider the implications of processes? You here, likely, have a coder at Microsoft told to track those that alter the document, so they choose to fetch the ID data for that user, not really caring what that data is.
All the world is unintended consequences.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 07:33 am (UTC)Interesting, if a bit over alarmist. All this has been /.'d to death many moons ago, sot it's a bit stale too.
Who's using Word '97 anymore?
CYa!
Mako
no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 09:00 am (UTC)The "Update Staff to OfficeXP" task is below the priority event horizon.
no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 10:37 am (UTC)then again, my version of MS Word stores things a little differently .. different platform and all ^_^
no subject
no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 11:32 pm (UTC)Word (all the copies I've ever used anyway) has an annoying habit of saving the path of the file in there somewhere. I don't know about other 'metadata' though (nor would I call a SSN 'metadata').
And then, empty documents are already 20K, so it's too bloated for me.
Government
Date: 2003-08-18 11:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 02:35 pm (UTC)-=TK
no subject
Date: 2003-08-18 02:32 pm (UTC)The intent of the metadata is to establish propriety on a document. Unfortunately, it is not designed well. The cases of deleted text come from the fact that Word was not coded properly as a text editor. When you save text, it often times creates a second document field inside the file, rather than removing the original. I would imagine this was from a failed version of recovery programs that was never cleaned up. It's an unfortunate side effect, but an even safer technique of protection is to not share MS documents.
As always, abstinence proves the safest route. ;)
-=TK