I Must Admit, I Don't Get It 0.o
Jul. 26th, 2004 01:03 pmY'know, I watched Transformers back in the day; I also watched He-Man, G.I. Joe, Thundercats, and all the rest of the "30-minute toy ad" cartoons of the 1980s. As far as I've ever been able to tell, all of them were about the same level of "mildly entertaining;" they all used the same scripts and just swapped out names, so really it was just a matter of which one was your particular favorite flavor.
I have lots of friends now who are way into Transformers; there have been lots of "SQUEEE!" noises coming from my friends list about the prospect of a new live-action Transformers movie. While I'm glad they're so happy, I have to admit that I'm puzzled at the intensity of the reaction.
I mean yeah, I thought it was neat that Inspector Gadget got a movie, but it was hardly worth bouncing off the walls for.
The only common item I can see is that the friends in question all seem to be 3 - 5 years younger than I am, which would put them as being 8 - 11 years old when those shows were on. 8 - 11 was Empire Strikes Back age for me, and I certainly continue to get enjoyment out of the good parts of the Star Wars saga. Maybe by the time Transformers was on, I'd passed the point where it could be magic for me? Of course, these days I'm pretty jaded ... you could tell me a big budget Speed Racer movie was in the works and I'd respond with, "Neat, I hope it doesn't suck."
And why Transformers particularly? If you like giant robots, why not Macross/Robotech? If you like '80s cartoons, why not Thundercats? Look as I may, I just can't see anything in Transformers worthy of more than, well, being mildly entertained.
Oh well. :) My friends are nuts, I guess. But who cares? As long as they're having fun! :)
-The Gneech
I have lots of friends now who are way into Transformers; there have been lots of "SQUEEE!" noises coming from my friends list about the prospect of a new live-action Transformers movie. While I'm glad they're so happy, I have to admit that I'm puzzled at the intensity of the reaction.
I mean yeah, I thought it was neat that Inspector Gadget got a movie, but it was hardly worth bouncing off the walls for.
The only common item I can see is that the friends in question all seem to be 3 - 5 years younger than I am, which would put them as being 8 - 11 years old when those shows were on. 8 - 11 was Empire Strikes Back age for me, and I certainly continue to get enjoyment out of the good parts of the Star Wars saga. Maybe by the time Transformers was on, I'd passed the point where it could be magic for me? Of course, these days I'm pretty jaded ... you could tell me a big budget Speed Racer movie was in the works and I'd respond with, "Neat, I hope it doesn't suck."
And why Transformers particularly? If you like giant robots, why not Macross/Robotech? If you like '80s cartoons, why not Thundercats? Look as I may, I just can't see anything in Transformers worthy of more than, well, being mildly entertained.
Oh well. :) My friends are nuts, I guess. But who cares? As long as they're having fun! :)
-The Gneech
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 10:31 am (UTC)(I was 6 at the time, Transformers was the coolest thing ever!!)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 10:36 am (UTC)-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 10:42 am (UTC)Excited yet?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 10:47 am (UTC)FWIW, in all honesty, I'm not sure a CGI movie about furries could work without being really creepy, unless they were vastly toonified (think Sully from Monsters, Inc.).
-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:56 pm (UTC)"Furry" encompasses many kinds of anthropomorphic, John.
Your take on it (in SJ) is toony; mine (in RF) is realistic.
There are fans of both "schools", but admittedly it seems
comedy works better with toon-style, whereas some folks have
a problem with gritty-serious stories done toon-style.
Still, a "Monsters, Inc."-style SJ film would probably be a HOOT---!
Keep your ears open, my friend. Ya nevah know---!
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:19 pm (UTC)I'd love to be an overpaid consultant on a project like that, tho. ;)
-The Gneech
(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 10:47 am (UTC)Personally, I'm still waiting the first really good "furry" sym-thespian character to appear in a movie. Stuart Little wasn't bad, but I think they can do better.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 10:49 am (UTC)-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:12 am (UTC)-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:06 am (UTC)-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:57 pm (UTC)V.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:26 pm (UTC)---------------------------------------------
Dashing and daring, courageous and caring
Faithful and friendly with stories to share
All through the forest they sing out in chorus
Marching along as their song fills the air
Gummi Bears, bouncing here and there and everywhere
High adventure that's beyond compare.
They are the Gummi Bears
Magic and mystery are part of their history
Along with the secret of Gummi Berry Juice
The legend is growing they take part in knowing
They fight for what's right in whatever they do
Gummi Bears, bouncing here and there and everywhere
High adventure that's beyond compare.
They are the Gummi Bears
-------------------------------------------
Yeah I wonder when Disney will realize they can make money off releasing some of thier older series on DVD... Gummi Bears, Aladin, Gargoles...
Anyone know if they're planning on releaseing Thundercats on DVD anytime soon ?
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:29 pm (UTC)-The Gneech
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:01 pm (UTC)And yeah...they had crummy little 2-episode videocassettes of the Dis Afternoon, I want the real deal!
V.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:11 am (UTC)From the corporate point of view, none of the first few years of toys were made from scratch; they were bought or licensed from Japanese toymakers. Why the hell Japan decided microscope robots would be fun is beyond me. Once Hasbro and Takara began producing original molds, the household items mostly disappeared.
V.
Go Joe!
From:no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:03 am (UTC)But FYI, Macross/Robotech didn't involve *sentient* robots, and Thundercats haven't been around in one form or another for 18 out of the past 20 years.
I mean, you remember the fanfervor when Episode I was announced, and I can't tell you how uninterested *I* was, so I guess I know how you feel. Nothing appeals to everyone ;-)
V.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:08 am (UTC)-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:28 pm (UTC)And Episode III: "Revenge of the Sith" I have no hopes for. At least it's a better title then the last two, which were so corny I thought the next one should be "Space Nazis Must Die" to continue the theme.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:59 pm (UTC)V.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:15 pm (UTC)I still say the highlight of that movie was the fact that they used a 'Weird Al' Yankovic song in it.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:21 am (UTC)-=TK
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:02 pm (UTC)V.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:46 pm (UTC)No, really, its no different than Star Trek in that respect. The original series was what... 74 episodes total? The original TF series, all 4 seasons, is easily that much. The only difference is Transformers had cool toys to buy. ;)
In the end, someone will go "SQUEE!" if there's any hint of a fan out there, for something in general. Heck, I'm sure someone would go "SQUEE!" if you said... Sienfeld The Movie.
Oh, and the reason folks don't go "SQUEE!" about Thundercats is... uh, they didn't make anything after the series. :( The bastards! They need to make Thundercats The Movie! SQUEEEEEEE!!!!
--Rhan/Salen
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:06 pm (UTC)Transformers is just one of those series that managed to pull a 'Star Trek' and produce a few new series and comics after they were gone. Helps get new fans, and older ones.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 12:46 pm (UTC)Mmm....Tygra...
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:16 pm (UTC)-TG
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 01:49 pm (UTC)The first season of that was offensive... It was like Transformer's Pokemon for cryin' out loud.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:31 pm (UTC)G1 didn't always have the best animation or writing, but it did have some interesting stories that most of its contemporaries weren't allowed to tell. Heck, the whole idea of "living" robots hadn't really been done before.
Much of G1 is silly, campy fun, but there are some really good episodes mixed in there: "Fire in the Sky", "The Golden Lagoon", "The Secret of Omega Supreme", "War Dawn","Dark Awakening", "Fight or Flee", "The Ultimate Weapon", and "The Burden Hardest to Bear" come to mind.
I don't know a lot about the Marvel comic, but it's usually regarded as having a much more serious tone, particularly once Simon Furman became the writer.
As long as the movie is treated like it's real science fiction rather than a feature-length ad, it should end up being watchable. I can almost guarantee that it won't be the best film ever made, but it also can't be much worse than Gili or the Star Wars prequels.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 03:16 pm (UTC)As for why Transformers and not the other mentioned titles... I bet the rights to Transformers were easier to get. And the fact that the toys are STILL in production means you've got built-in marketing already going.
>.>
Date: 2004-07-26 06:20 pm (UTC)i get like.... 4. >.>
*ENVY!*
^~Kai
Re: >.>
Date: 2004-07-26 07:44 pm (UTC)-=TK
<.<
Date: 2004-08-05 01:18 pm (UTC)^~Kai
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 09:06 pm (UTC)Bring back Galaxy Rangers...now, *that* was a kick-ass animated series. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-07-26 11:34 pm (UTC)Most of the time, the demands of having to sell toys created archetypes rather than actual characters and stories that were so campy they make the Adam West Batman series look serious, but underneath all of that was a show that tried to take itself seriously and create engaging stories. We got to see the villains in a social setting, stories with morals that weren't blatantly beaten into the viewer's head, a few well developed characters (a miracle itself considering the size of the cast), and neither faction was depicted as absolutely good or evil- some of the Autobots would have made better Decepticons, some characters would have been friends if they weren't on opposing factions, and at least one 'Con switched sides.
Some of that love is Star Trek-like nostalgia, some of it is purely a desire to be entertained, and some of it is people perceiving a bit of depth in what is otherwise a purely commercial product.
One more thing. Technically, Transformers and its contemporaries are twenty-two minute toy commercials. Toy manufacturers weren't, and still aren't IIRC, allowed to air commercials for a toy line during the same timeslot as the show based on those toys.