the_gneech: (Kero Power Tie)
It's been a while since I posted one of these things; that's generally a good sign, because when I'm busy enjoying all the things I'm thankful for, I don't have to remind myself that I'm thankful for them.

Nevertheless, I'm posting one tonight, by way of thanking the universe and the wonderful people in it for all the things that make my life so good. ^.^

Three Good Things About Today


  1. Did my Christmas shopping for [livejournal.com profile] lythandra done.

  2. Got the Flim-Flam Brothers and a Super Speedy Cider Squeezy toy set from Fluttershy for Christmas.

  3. Picked up an awesome and gorgeous scarf.

  4. Bonus Good Thing: Had fun watching Psych.


Three Goals for Tomorrow


  1. See the new Star Wars movie with [livejournal.com profile] lythandra and [livejournal.com profile] sirfox

  2. Work a shift at SBX

  3. Get some art done, either solo or as an art jam


Good night world, and have an awesome tomorrow. I love ya. ♥

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Mysterious Beard)
So on the way home, Pandora played a song by Skeewiff called "Flanger Freak." Regardéz:



This being an awesome tune, I wanted to make a note of it and knew I wouldn't remember the name. As it was, I could barely hold onto it long enough to fire up Siri and give her the instruction: "Remember Skeewiff Flanger!"

With a completely straight face (or the android equivalent thereto), Siri replied, "Okay, I'll create a reminder to ski with blender."

Welp.

Now I have a cartoon in my head of Comfort, skiing down the side of a mountain, holding a blender over her head like a trophy. Nice one, Siri.

Starbucks Moments: The Day Santa Liked My Muttonchops


On Monday, a man who I am pretty sure was Santa Claus in his civilian clothes came into the store looking flustered and somewhat lost, but upon seeing me (looking not too different from the icon for this post) immediately brightened up and said, "I love your facial hair!"

To which I replied with a thank you and proceeded to show him how the Starbucks smartphone app works because, being Santa, it's all still pretty new to him.

A woman also complimented my haircut-and-muttonchops combo tonight, saying that "It really worked." So apparently it does!

And now, back to prepping for my MFF flight. *kermitflails!*

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Mysterious Beard)
289.3, down 1.1 lbs from last week, total weight lost 29.7 lbs, average lost 0.9 lbs/week. I have shrunk out of multiple pairs of pants and shirts; even shirts that used to be on the snug size of "a good fit" are feeling roomy on me now. Some of my old work shirts are more like nightshirts now. :P

I've also found that Levis 550s, a "relaxed" cut of jean that I used to favor, is now too baggy for me to comfortably wear, even when it's the right size: I end up with large flaps of fabric hanging off the backs of my legs. I picked up some 505s, which are a more standard cut (in size 44, woot), and overall they fit nicely, except that the waistline rides a little lower than I'm used to. I wouldn't mind really, except I'm a little worried about "plumber's cleavage." It's not really a problem as long as I have a shirt long enough to stay tucked in (or a top shirt over it), but it's still something I'm not used to having to consider.

I'm starting to reach the fun part of the journey, I think. :)

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Mysterious Beard)
“Dress is a very foolish thing; and yet it is a very
foolish thing for a man not to be well dressed.”


—Philip Stanhope, Earl of Chesterfield, in a letter to his son; 1745.


Yesterday was a Bad Emotions Day [1], but it did have a few bright spots. One of them was that I now have a size 44 belt and can put it on with room to spare. This is the latest in a series of "trade down" moves I have been making, size-wise. Over the past few months I have donated several items of shirts, trousers, and shoes that I have simply shrunk out of.

That, my friends, is a pretty awesome feeling. ;)

Although finances are tight, I am trying to make sure that my wardrobe gets regularly updated, one or two pieces at a time, to keep up with the changes in my body shape. Part of this is because I am incredibly vain and want my clothes to fit. ;) But part of it is also so that if I start to slip on diet and exercise and start to plump up again, my clothes will be too tight and prompt me to take corrective steps. I don't want to be able to fit into my old clothes.

I have not yet quite reached the stage of being able to easily shop in mainstream outlets yet. In men's clothes, those tend to stop at a tight 42– on top of which, I am 6'2" tall and so will always need a "long." But I'm closer now than I've been in decades.

Finally, while I'm on the topic: When It Comes to Style, Younger Men Leaving Older Guys In the Dust

As they walked, the three dapper lads parted a human sea of male fashion faux pas, leaving young women glancing back for a second look and middle-aged men gazing scornfully. Call it the fashion age divide.

...The young man’s uniform, once composed of low hanging jeans and ironic T-shirts, has transformed into cufflinks, high collars and tie clips. It’s defining the modern man look and leaving the elders looking like schlubs.

“I’m definitely seeing guys in their 20s dressing way better than guys in their 40s,” says Melissa Austria, owner of Got Style men’s wear in Toronto...


Aww, yeah!

Oh, and on a related note: What If Nike Sold Oranges And Apple Sold iMilk? Some pretty awesome stuff here. :)

-The Gneech

[1] When you're a chronic depressive, your emotions are often like the weather. You can't control 'em, you just have to ride them out. Yesterday was one such day for me; I felt like crud for most of the evening, even tho there was no real reason for it. I'm better today, tho. :)
the_gneech: (Jeeves Strangle)
So as I was putting on my shoes this morning, one of the laces– which had been threatening disaster for some time– gave up and snapped right in two. Fortunately, in the closet I have a basket of extra shoelaces and other footwear necessities for just such an emergency. But it was also a good thing that happened, because it prompted me to take a good look at the shoe, and discover a massive, ugly acid burn that I hadn't noticed. Last week sometime, while pumping gas, some of the nasty stuff dripped onto the shoe, and though I thought I had cleaned it up in time, it seems not. For a minute I thought the shoe was ruined.

Rarity-- Call the fashion police!

Now keep in mind, I love these shoes. Dressy enough to look sharp, but with a gum sole and as comfortable as any sneaker, these shoes are a major weapon in my dapperness arsenal. There was only one thing to be done! Break out the shoe polish and hope for a miracle!

I'm happy to say, the shoes were saved. :) But while I was sitting there furiously polishing, I started to wonder how many other guys there are out there who would a) be wearing a shoe like this in the first place, and b) would leap to the rescue if they found one damaged like that. I'm a writer/illustrator now, working from home on my own hours and as my own boss– I could spend the rest of my life in PJs if I wanted to, only pulling on pants for the occasional visit to Starbucks. According to the current mode of our culture, that's what I should want to do.

But I don't. Unless I'm in really dire straits, I make a point of "dressing for work" every day (even if I don't actually do it until lunchtime) and while it may be "biz cas," it's still a well-dressed "biz cas." For men especially, the bar of grooming and comportment has been set so damn low that just by doing what I consider the bare minimum, I'm still "dressed up" compared to almost everyone I meet.

My dad was of the opinion that a pocket tee was the only kind of shirt anyone should ever wear– with certain exceptions I won't wear a shirt that doesn't have at least three buttons on it. I asked for and was well pleased to receive a cordless iron from my in-laws for Christmas (and I use it regularly). Heck, I have a "shoe care emergency kit." Is all that stuff really as weird as I think it is? Or have I just been traveling in the wrong circles?

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
I had written off Men's Wearhouse in my suit search, on the grounds that almost everything I ever want to buy there always stops two sizes below mine. As my size changes up or down, their selection does as well, to always maintain this precious balance.

So instead, after checking the Austin Horrible Golf Clothes For Oversize Old Men Big & Tall website and confirming that yes, they are indeed open Sundays from noon until 4:00 p.m., we went over there, only to find a locked door and a sign that said "Closed Sundays in July and August."

...

Guess they're doing market research out on the golf course. ¬.¬ Whatever they're doing, they're not getting my business.

So in a desperation move, on the way home I went ahead and went into Men's Wearhouse and said to the salesman, "I'm 6'2.5", 33 inseam, 54" chest. Have you got anything for me?" Instead of the regretful, "sorry, we stop two sizes below that" I was expecting, he said, "Of course, sir, step right this way!"

Once jaw was picked up off the floor, I started trying on suits. It turns out that my chest measurement has gone up considerably since the last time I bought a suit (no big surprise, it's been a long time), so I ended up in a 60... with sleeves way too long and trousers falling off completely. Go fig! But the standard procedure is "fit the biggest part and take in the rest," and so that's what we proceeded to do.

I ended up with one of these:

Kenneth Cole Charcoal Suit

...and with their end-of-summer-sale I picked up one of these for +$100:

Jones New York vested windowpane suit

...except in a tweedy gray-brown which for some reason they don't have on the website, but which I quite liked.

A few minutes of fitting and adjusting later, and they were off to the in-house tailor for fitting. I made a point of getting them to add buttons for bracers as well-- if I'm going to spend the money on a nice suit, I'm going all the way and getting it tricked out the way I want. Bracers, pleats, and cuffs, baybeh!

So this time next week, I'll have two very fancy suits and will be ready for the wedding. And Men's Wearhouse made a fairly hefty sale (including two shirts and two pair of bracers to go with the suits), while Austin's Big & Tall will have continued to fail to get any money from me.

The dapper gent has spoken. ;)

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Me Barbarian)
Big workout today! Besides being halfway to the One Month Party (w00t), it was changeup day: 1 set of 15 reps each at +15 lbs (or as close to that as I could arrange). It definitely went faster and left me more wiped out by the end, but it also helped me get a feel for where some of my weak areas are.

Numbers hidden behind cut. )
Weight: 326 lbs

I wish I felt like I could trust Zippy the Wonder Scale. Today's reading suggests that I've lost 5 pounds since starting, which would not be an unreasonable result... except that Friday morning it said I'd lost 9, which I frankly don't believe. So I'll keep watching the aggregate and see what the doctor's scale says in August.

And now, on to my day! I need to buy a suit today, as I'm going to a wedding in two weeks and don't really have any appropriate garb. (An outdoor wedding. In August. Do you just hate me, wedding couple? Did you plan this all as part of some elaborate vendetta I know nothing of? It's the only explanation that makes sense.)

Also ordering my drawing table and hoping to get some commish work done. Gonna be a busy day! I'd better hit the shower.

-TG
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
My new shoes came!

Buddha approves of my footwear stylings.
Buddha approves of my footwear stylings.


The simple pleasures are best in life.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
daily-steampunk.com: A Fashion Statement

It's a good question.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Jeeves Very Good)
[Error: unknown template qotd]

[livejournal.com profile] athelind answered this so perfectly that I'm simply going to echo it here:

What do you love about the wintertime?

Some people talk about weather in terms of whether it's cold enough to need a sweater, a jacket, or a gigantic wool overcoat. Some will, in fact, assert that California "never gets cold enough" to justify the last item on the list.

I wait all year for it to get just cool enough to let me pull out my peacoat, and bundle up in layers.

I love winter clothing. It's cozy, it's comfortable, and it's a whole lot easer to approximate "dapper" (or at least "presentable") when you can mix and match a few layers of apparel and not have to strip down to a minimum of lightweight garments to stay comfortable. When it's cold, I can always put something more on; when it's hot, there's only so much you can take off before you have to pull out the flensing knives.

All my favorite clothes are warm clothes. I don't have any real "favorites" in summerwear; it's just a matter of "this will minimize my suffering".


-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Kero asleep)
I just got the podcast done and posted! It wasn't easy. -.-

Anyway, that's not what this post is about. This post is about two things:

First, a great blog post regarding fashion vs. body image.

Second, well ... this:



I promise you, it isn't ponies.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
[Error: unknown template qotd]

Revel in fashion and jewelry, 'cause that's something guys just can't do -- even the most sartorially-inclined guy has very limited resources.

That, and complain about how nobody makes decent shoes for women, because they don't.

Anything beyond that would be entirely a matter of context.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
To heck with MicroSoft ... when I say Bing, THIS is what I mean!



-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
I can fit into my waistcoat again! And with breathing room, no less. Thanks, Worldgate Sport and Health! :D

Time to rock out the 1880's railroad conductor look at Dragon*Con...

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
Every now and again, I have to go through my wardrobe, take stock, expunge everything that isn't suitable (which often tends out to be a surprisingly large amount), then sally forth into the harsh and unfriendly world of "Big and Tall" stores in an attempt to have more than two pairs of pants and one shirt still wearable.

This time I've consigned three trash bags' worth to Goodwill, with another trash bag's worth flat out discarded because they were so worn out as to be unwearable. Many of these were t-shirts that I bought for love but simply can't wear any more, either because they've shrunk, I've grown, or both -- or I wore them until they were so full of holes that one more wearing would reduce them to a thin yellow spray.

Usually, I don't toss something until I know for a fact that I just can't get into it any more; this time I was considerably more ruthless. I had a lot of items in my wardrobe that just barely fit but made me look (or feel) like a stuffed sausage, didn't really look good on me but were passable if everything else was in the laundry, or similar "Desperation Day" outfits. This is a sneakier piece of the hoarding instinct I learned from my mother but have been endeavoring to purge since college -- reinforced by the fact that every once in a blue moon, I am out of clean laundry and have to resort to a Desperation Day item.

But years of this had led there being more Desperation Day items than Every Day items. After all, the Desperation Day items don't wear out, because I almost never wear them. So this round's purge included jettisoning the Desperation Day items. Shirts that fit except for the top button? Gone. Pants that could be zipped if I lay on the floor and suck in my breath? Gone. Ties that made passers-by on the street grab at their eyes and cry out for a merciful God to strike them down? Gone. Failed attempts at Suburban Jungle merchandise? Outa there! [1]

It was a healthy thing to do, and I'm glad I did it. On the other hand, it has left me with two sets of slacks suitable for work, one pair of jeans, and almost no "casual day" shirts other than a couple of polos with the Watering Hole logo on them. So today is "Build Gneech a New Wardrobe!" day. Or possibly, because it will start with a haircut, "Gneech Makeover Day."

Stacy and Clinton, your services will not be needed, but thank you.

I have also been pondering changing up my "Geek Goatee 101" facial hair for something else, but I haven't been able to decide on a good replacement. I absolutely require something in the way of beardage, because otherwise my chin gets lost in the big pink moon that is my face. But a nautical (i.e., "Riker") beard just makes me look scraggly and itches to boot, and I'm not sure I could pull off an artsy "vertical caterpillar beard" or anything like that. So it may be that the Geek Goatee 101 will have to suffice.

-The Gneech

[1] I did reserve a pile for "sentimental items," clothes that I can't or won't wear, but don't want to get rid of, such as the t-shirt I designed for the opening of the Borders Bookstore where I once worked, or the my Call of Cthulhu and Wing Commander III promotional shirts. But they are separated out in my closet so they won't get mixed in to my actual clothes for wearing.
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
Friday is payday, and along with that comes the season's sartorial shopping spree. Casual Male has sent me a ton of coupons and store gift certs, apparently hurting for business, so that will be my first stop. Other usual suspects include the JC Penney Big and Tall catalog and maybe a side-trip to Joseph A. Bank, although they're not likely to have much I can wear beyond socks or possibly a tie. ("I'm sorry sir, you aren't a tiny little wisp of a man, so you must go to our related store Austin Big and Tall, even though all they carry is golf clothes for André the Giant.")

I have started to look with serious intent at the possibility of finding a tailor. Not that I want to go "all bespoke, all the time," but there are certain pieces that I want that just aren't mass-produced in my size, assuming they're mass-produced at all. [livejournal.com profile] mammallamadevil has corralled her mum into trying her hand at a vest or two for me, which is much appreciated, but tailoring is something that's notoriously tricky to do from the far side of the country. I really should find a local for this task.

While [livejournal.com profile] lythandra and I were taking our morning constitutional around the building today, I happened to spot a guy on the far side of the parking lot wearing a long-sleeved white dress shirt and a knit sweater-vest. Argh! Envy. If I was wearing that today, I'd be lying dead in a pool of my own perspiration. As it is, I've got on a short-sleeved shirt, have a fan blowing on me, and I'm still uncomfortably warm.

I wonder if there's some way to reset your internal thermometer the way light treatment resets your internal clock? I want to be one of those people who's always saying "Ohmygawd it's FREEZING in here!" so I can dress properly and not die from it.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
I aim to dress up rather than dress down; this is old news. However, there comes a point at which sartorial agony crosses into ranting insanity, and George Will has just crossed it.

Long ago, when James Dean and Marlon Brando wore it, denim was, Akst says, “a symbol of youthful defiance.” Today, Silicon Valley billionaires are rebels without causes beyond poses, wearing jeans when introducing new products. Akst’s summa contra denim is grand as far as it goes, but it only scratches the surface of this blight on Americans’ surfaces. Denim is the infantile uniform of a nation in which entertainment frequently features childlike adults (Seinfeld, Two and a Half Men) and cartoons for adults (King of the Hill). Seventy-five percent of American “gamers” — people who play video games — are older than 18 and nevertheless are allowed to vote. In their undifferentiated dress, children and their childish parents become undifferentiated audiences for juvenilized movies (the six — so far — Batman adventures and Indiana Jones and the Credit-Default Swaps, coming soon to a cineplex near you). Denim is the clerical vestment for the priesthood of all believers in democracy’s catechism of leveling — thou shalt not dress better than society’s most slovenly. To do so would be to commit the sin of lookism — of believing that appearance matters. That heresy leads to denying the universal appropriateness of everything, and then to the elitist assertion that there is good and bad taste. Denim is the carefully calculated costume of people eager to communicate indifference to appearances. But the appearances that people choose to present in public are cues from which we make inferences about their maturity and respect for those to whom they are presenting themselves.


Er ... what? 0.o This isn't commentary on style, this is more like the paranoid ramblings of a schizophrenic.

The only reason I happened upon this is because [livejournal.com profile] kinkyturtle posted a link to it, commenting that it reminded him on one of my own posts on the subject of dress (I'm guessing it was this one). I am gratified that he was quick to point out the distinction between my wistful desire that people would dress better generally compared to this column's scattershot condemnation of anyone who doesn't Act Like a Grownup for Chrissake — but at the same time to be mentioned in the same context of such raving lunacy has given me pause.

So for the record: if you like denim, please, by all means wear it. I have no idea what George Will is smoking.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
You remember my giant splurge on vests? Here's how it played out:

Thornton: Out of stock in 2X and canceled. Experience suggests it would not have fit anyway.

Vigilante: Received in 2X, too small, returned for refund because it doesn't come in 3X.

Canvas Double-Breasted: Received in 3X, slightly snug (!) but viable fit. Extremely snazzy. Lost a button after a week, but [livejournal.com profile] lythandra was on hand for repairs.

Pocketwatch: Received, worn with vest, also extremely snazzy.

Alternate Double-Breasted: Received in 52. Fit more like a 42. WTF. Return in exchange for a 54 in the hopes that it was mis-marked, still pending.

NET RESULTS: Four vests ordered, one wearable, one pending, two failures. Plus pocketwatch.

Ain't easy being a dapper gent.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
While I'm largely known for my signature grey fedora, another item of clothing I'm often seen in, particularly as my interest in personal fashion has gone up, is my beloved brown wool vest. Unfortunately, it's going on something like ten years old now and getting quite threadbare in spots, so I've been shopping, without much success, for a replacement.

Problem is, the only vests to be readily found are either cheapy ones for skinny teenagers (which I am not), knit sweater-vests (not what I'm looking for), or the third piece of a three-piece suit (also not what I'm looking for). Along with all the other ways men have forgotten how to dress in the past ~50 years, they've largely forgotten about the vest, at least in the US. I don't know if the same is true of the UK, but it wouldn't surprise me.

Like most items of clothing, the vest has a specific purpose — i.e., it's intended to unify the lines of the body, while being cooler than a complete coat. Originally, the vest was simply a sleeveless coat, you see. The "three piece suit" was actually trousers plus vest with an overcoat, but when the suit became its own entity, people would then start putting an overcoat on over their coat and vest, and then wondering why they bothered to have a vest. (The answer was, "because yer doin' it wrong, dumbass," but education in such matters got lost somewhere along the line.)

If you look at a two-piece suit that's tailored properly and worn buttoned, it creates a unified effect (which is why coat and trousers are either the same or compatible colors and textures). But before the days of air conditioning, it could be awfully warm in the summertime to be minding the store (or the office) in a full coat, so the vest was invented. If you look at the earliest vests, you'll notice that they had collars just like suit coats do today. Unless you were really freezing, you wouldn't wear a vest and a coat and an overcoat. It'd be like wearing a hat over another hat. If you expected to be cold at work, you'd wear a coat and an overcoat. If you expected to be warm at work, you'd wear a vest and an overcoat. (This is where the three-piece suit ended up causing so much trouble — people didn't realize that the coat of a three piece suit is an overcoat, it's just one designed to coordinate with the vest and trousers.)

Anyway!

These days, the movement in trendy fashions is to a carefully-crafted shabbiness, and has been for decades. This is nothing new, and is actually not that bad a style really, when done right. The whole "open-collar shirt, maybe V-neck, jeans pooled at the feet, unbuttoned blazer" thing is an easy look to pull off and for most guys that's all they really care about. Whatever dandies like myself may think about that, it's the way things are and there's no point in wishing it was still 1930. Given the way a lot of people dress, we have to be grateful for crafted shabbiness. ;)

But in the spirit of "be the change you want to see in the world," I make an effort to go the extra mile and actually dress better than I have to. Who knows, maybe it's my way of compensating for the permanent spare tire that no amount of exercise will ever get rid of, but as it is the major part of my appearance that I actually can control, and I am terribly vain, I'm going for it. And in the case of vests, that means special ordering, because a guy with a 52" chest just plain cannot buy vests off the rack in 2008. Ain't gonna happen.

But in a way, that's almost a blessing in disguise; because to find a proper vest, I ended up scouring the internet until I found a company that sells honest-to-goodness waistcoats. And from them I ordered one of these, one of these, and, because I've wanted one since I was a kid, one of these. (I also tried to order one of these, but was crushed to be informed that they were out of stock. I may order one of these in dark brown instead.)

"Um ... Gneech?" you may be saying (assuming you're still reading). "You're not, like, gonna start wearing a Buffalo Bill Cody costume to work, are you?" The answer is no, I'm not. For one thing, I wouldn't look good in a cravat. For another, even my dandification has limits. I'm sticking with contemporary shirts (no starched collars, thank you), necktie, and so on. As much as I would like to go around town dressed like a Time Lord, I don't think I'd be able to do it without it being a complete affectation, which is antithetical to having real style.

-The Gneech
the_gneech: (Classic Style)
Fickle butterfly of fashion that I am, I think I may have found a livelier alternative to the sadly-moribund Classic Style Magazine, to wit Men's Flair. This is a blogazine [1] rather than an actual print mag, which is unfortunate but probably inevitable. The web giveth, the web taketh away, le sigh!

The site has contributors from both the U.S. and the U.K. and has a nice blend of focus between the two arenas. I particularly enjoyed Where Style Becomes Costume. The site updates regularly (two or three times a week, seems to be the pattern) and has an RSS feed, not yet syndicated on LJ but consumable by your RSS reader of choice.

EDIT: There is now! [livejournal.com profile] mens_flair

Enjoy!

-The Gneech

[1] Neologistic agony, revisited.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  1 2345
6789 101112
13141516171819
20 212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 02:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios